On 02/16/2013 04:50 AM, Axel Lin wrote: > Ignore the setting and show "Only SM0/SM1 can set slew rate" warning is > enough, > then we can return 0 instead of -EINVAL in tps6586x_regulator_set_slew_rate(). > > Otherwise, probe() fails.
Why does probe() fail; what is trying to set a slew rate on a regulator that doesn't support it? At least a few days ago in linux-next, this patch wasn't needed AFAIK. Is the problem something new? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
