Hi Tejun, On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:19:25 -0800 Tejun Heo <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:14:13AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:11:25 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > This is very different from what has been in linux-next (it looks like > > > you have been cherry-picking fixes from other sources into your for-next > > > branch?): > > > > Or maybe what is in linux-next is a mash up of several different things? > > Ooh, wq/for-next was combination of wq/for-3.9, wq/for-3.9-cleanups > and wq/for-3.9-async. I'm fairly sure all the commits are accounted > for. Checking again just in case.... > > $ git rev-list --pretty --oneline tmp ^next-20130219 > bd26f12 Merge branch 'for-3.9-async' into tmp > 0f985c9 Merge branch 'for-3.9-cleanups' into tmp > 1438ade5 workqueue: un-GPL function delayed_work_timer_fn() > > tmp is for-3.9 + for-3.9-async + for-3.9-cleanups, so yeah other than > the last cherry-pick, everything seems to be in order.
Thanks for checking - sorry for the noise. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
pgpNGUE6FM9SN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
