Hi,

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:07:56 +0530 Vineet Gupta <vineet.gup...@synopsys.com> 
wrote:
>
> >> I guess you'll have to do something similar for arch/metag, and Vineet
> >> will do it for arch/arc.
> 
> After getting the tip-bot msg about Stephen's patch for -mm, I never saw it in
> -next and thus was not sure how when it will start showing up in -next.

It arrived in next-21030220.

> >> Stephen's patch is currently in Andrew's tree, and I don't see an easy
> >> way to coordinate this. The patch we will need once both are merged
> >> is below.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> > 
> > FWIW:
> > Acked-by: James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com> (for arch/metag)
> > 
> Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com> (for arch/arc)
> 
> So this means Stephen's patch - once merged will take care of existing in-tree
> arches and your's will take care of metag/arc.

The easiest way would be to put the follow up patches in Andrew's patch
set (since it is still based on top of linux-next).  It usually is merged
pretty late, so I would get your own trees merged ASAP and this can be
taken care of when Andrew sends his patch set to Linus.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    s...@canb.auug.org.au

Attachment: pgpKDIMDbq3ss.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to