On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Raghavendra KT <raghavendra.kt.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:56:54AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> >>> * Shuah Khan <shuahk...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Linux Kernel Mailing List >>> > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> wrote: >>> > > Gitweb: >>> > > http://git.kernel.org/linus/;a=commit;h=c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d >>> > > Commit: c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d >>> > > Parent: e0a79f529d5ba2507486d498b25da40911d95cf6 >>> > > Author: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> >>> > > AuthorDate: Tue Feb 5 14:37:51 2013 +0300 >>> > > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> >>> > > CommitDate: Tue Feb 5 12:59:29 2013 +0100 >>> > > >>> > > sched: Fix signedness bug in yield_to() >>> > > >>> > > In 7b270f6099 "sched: Bail out of yield_to when source and >>> > > target runqueue has one task" we changed this to store -ESRCH so >>> > > it needs to be signed. >>> > >>> > Dan, Ingo, >>> > >>> > I can't find the 7b270f6099 "sched: Bail out of yield_to when >>> > source and target runqueue has one task" in the latest Linus's >>> > git. Am I missing something. >>> > >>> > The current kenel/sched/core.c doesn't have the code from the >>> > associated patch https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2016651/ >>> >>> As per the lkml discussion that one was supposed to go upstream >>> via the KVM tree. Marcelo? >> >> commit c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d >> Author: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> >> Date: Tue Feb 5 14:37:51 2013 +0300 >> >> sched: Fix signedness bug in yield_to() >> >> In 7b270f6099 "sched: Bail out of yield_to when source and >> target runqueue has one task" we changed this to store -ESRCH so >> it needs to be signed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> >> Cc: kbu...@01.org >> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> >> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efa...@gmx.de> >> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130205113751.GA20521@elgon.mountain >> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> >> > > IIUC, we are only changing variable in yield_to from bool to int. > I am curious whether we need changes in struct sched_class (sched.h) > > bool (*yield_to_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preempt); > ==> > int (*yield_to_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preempt); > > otherwise we would assign bool value to int here > > yielded = curr->sched_class->yield_to_task(rq, p, preempt); > > this return values also cascaded to kvm_main.c. > > If we need to patchup entire thing, I can cook a correction patch. > > Thanks and Regards > Raghu
Right/. I was attempting to back-port c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d to stables when I noticed the discrepancy. My concerns are: 1. Does it make sense to have c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d in without 7b270f6099 "sched: Bail out of yield_to when source and target runqueue has one task" and? 2. Second concern is, is c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d is enough or more changes are needed? does __yield_to prototype needs changes as well. -- Shuah -- Shuah -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/