On Tuesday 26 February 2013 06:46 PM, Ian Lartey wrote:
is_palmas_charger checks for the presence of charging
functionality in the device
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <g...@slimlogic.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ian Lartey <i...@slimlogic.co.uk>
---
include/linux/mfd/palmas.h | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/palmas.h b/include/linux/mfd/palmas.h
index 3129f9a..98c0567 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/palmas.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/palmas.h
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@
/* The ID_REVISION NUMBERS */
#define PALMAS_CHIP_OLD_ID 0x0000
#define PALMAS_CHIP_ID 0xC035
+#define PALMAS_CHIP_CHARGER_ID 0xC036
+
+#define is_palmas(a) (((a) == PALMAS_CHIP_OLD_ID) || \
+ ((a) == PALMAS_CHIP_ID))
+#define is_palmas_charger(a) ((a) == PALMAS_CHIP_CHARGER_ID)
TI says this as TPS80036 and original palma as TPS65913/TPS65914. Not
sure whether palma_charger is correct or not here.
But above change looks good.
Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan<ldewan...@nvidia.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
