On 03/05/2013 01:16 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc e1000-devel, Jeff, Bruce] > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:16:41AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: >>> So it looks Bjorn has taken most of them and the e1000e one will go >>> through the e1000e maintainers. I'll test after the merge window is >>> done. >> >> Issue still persists on 3.9-rc1 :-( : >> >> Mar 4 21:47:34 nazgul vmunix: [ 3223.412541] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up >> 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx >> Mar 4 21:47:34 nazgul vmunix: [ 3223.412554] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: >> 10/100 speed: disabling TSO >> Mar 4 21:47:35 nazgul vmunix: [ 3224.034158] Uhhuh. NMI received for >> unknown reason 2c on CPU 0. >> Mar 4 21:47:35 nazgul vmunix: [ 3224.034166] Do you have a strange power >> saving mode enabled? >> Mar 4 21:47:35 nazgul vmunix: [ 3224.034168] Dazed and confused, but trying >> to continue > > The e1000e changes didn't get merged, did they? I don't see the > following changes mentioned at https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/4/185 in > 3.9-rc1: > > e1000e: fix pci-device enable-counter balance > e1000e: fix runtime power management transitions > e1000e: fix accessing to suspended device
You're right. They are not even in -next :(. -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/