On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 12:27 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:29:01AM -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 11:14 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:02:48AM -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > > They are in my queue of e1000e patches for net and are being testing > > > > currently. I should be able to push them upstream this week. > > > > > > Right, if you'd like me to run them here too, let me know. > > > > Any additional testing is very much appreciated, so feel free to test > > the patches with what hardware you have. > > Yep, it looks good, machine suspends ok again. I'll watch it in the next > couple of days. > > The only problem that remains is this: > > [ 103.137024] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: power state changed by ACPI to D3cold > [ 103.161032] ehci-pci 0000:00:1d.0: power state changed by ACPI to D3cold > [ 103.462328] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow > Control: Rx/Tx > [ 103.462342] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO > [ 108.472847] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 3c on CPU 0. <--- > [ 108.472850] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled? > [ 108.472851] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue > > AFAIR, Rafael said it had something to do with the suspend kernel not > picking up settings done to the main kernel on time. Or something to > that effect, my memory is hazy. >
Would you like me to add your Tested-by: to the patches?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
