On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 10:42 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 03/05/2013 01:16 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [+cc e1000-devel, Jeff, Bruce] > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:16:41AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > >>> So it looks Bjorn has taken most of them and the e1000e one will go > >>> through the e1000e maintainers. I'll test after the merge window is > >>> done. > >> > >> Issue still persists on 3.9-rc1 :-( : > >> > >> Mar 4 21:47:34 nazgul vmunix: [ 3223.412541] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up > >> 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx > >> Mar 4 21:47:34 nazgul vmunix: [ 3223.412554] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: > >> 10/100 speed: disabling TSO > >> Mar 4 21:47:35 nazgul vmunix: [ 3224.034158] Uhhuh. NMI received for > >> unknown reason 2c on CPU 0. > >> Mar 4 21:47:35 nazgul vmunix: [ 3224.034166] Do you have a strange power > >> saving mode enabled? > >> Mar 4 21:47:35 nazgul vmunix: [ 3224.034168] Dazed and confused, but > >> trying to continue > > > > The e1000e changes didn't get merged, did they? I don't see the > > following changes mentioned at https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/4/185 in > > 3.9-rc1: > > > > e1000e: fix pci-device enable-counter balance > > e1000e: fix runtime power management transitions > > e1000e: fix accessing to suspended device > > You're right. They are not even in -next :(. >
I have them in my queue for net, so I should be pushing them later this week once validation has a chance to look at them.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
