On 03/04, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > > Both issues are easily fixed by indicating to lockdep that lglock's local > locks are not recursive. We shouldn't use the rwlock acquire/release > functions here, as lglock doesn't share the same semantics. Instead > we can base our lockdep annotations on the lock_acquire_shared > (for local lglock) and lock_acquire_exclusive (for global lglock) > helpers.
IOW, with this patch lglock looks like rw_semaphore for lockdep... Again, I can't ack this change, but afaics it is fine. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
