On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/04, Michel Lespinasse wrote: >> >> Both issues are easily fixed by indicating to lockdep that lglock's local >> locks are not recursive. We shouldn't use the rwlock acquire/release >> functions here, as lglock doesn't share the same semantics. Instead >> we can base our lockdep annotations on the lock_acquire_shared >> (for local lglock) and lock_acquire_exclusive (for global lglock) >> helpers. > > IOW, with this patch lglock looks like rw_semaphore for lockdep...
Yes. I could have actually made lglock use the rwsem helpers, but I think that would be quite confusing... -- Michel "Walken" Lespinasse A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
