On 3/7/13, Eric W. Biederman <ebied...@xmission.com> wrote: > Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> writes: > >> Greetings, >> >> I got the below oops and the first bad commit is > > Doh! On a second look that change is totally wrong. Of course we need > to up the ref-count every time we create a new process. Especially if > we don't do anything with namespaces. > > I was looking at it from the wrong angle last night. I should have > known better. > > Patch dropped. >
Sad to know :( . From the debug messages, it's kmemcheck report. I can't related the problem specified with the patch I've proposed. It seems at task exit path, at switch_task_namespaces() - after my patch atomic_dec_and_test(&ns->count) becomes true (-1), thus free_nsproxy() gets called. But, free_nsproxy() shouldn't get called here. Am I right? Or there's something else? Thanks, Rakib -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
