On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 09:49 +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion on that, but I prefer not to have the list
> statically in the SoC specific drivers. I think counting the number of
> unique functions for each SoC specific driver once and verify the above
> heuristic (fewer unique functions than pins) is still valid. Then drop
> the krealloc and leave the array the way it is allocated on devm_kzalloc.

Yeah. If you stick a check in the loop and make it warn if it *would*
have run over the end of the array, that sounds like it ought to be
fine. Something like this, perhaps? Still untested but otherwise
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <david.woodho...@intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-mvebu.c 
b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-mvebu.c
index c689c04..55d55d5 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-mvebu.c
@@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static struct pinctrl_ops mvebu_pinctrl_ops = {
        .dt_free_map = mvebu_pinctrl_dt_free_map,
 };
 
-static int _add_function(struct mvebu_pinctrl_function *funcs, const char 
*name)
+static int _add_function(struct mvebu_pinctrl_function *funcs, int nr_funcs,
+                        const char *name)
 {
        while (funcs->num_groups) {
                /* function already there */
@@ -487,7 +488,11 @@ static int _add_function(struct mvebu_pinctrl_function 
*funcs, const char *name)
                        return -EEXIST;
                }
                funcs++;
+               nr_funcs--;
        }
+       if (!nr_funcs)
+               return -EOVERFLOW;
+
        funcs->name = name;
        funcs->num_groups = 1;
        return 0;
@@ -501,7 +506,7 @@ static int mvebu_pinctrl_build_functions(struct 
platform_device *pdev,
        int n, s;
 
        /* we allocate functions for number of pins and hope
-        * there are less unique functions than pins available */
+        * there are fewer unique functions than pins available */
        funcs = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, pctl->desc.npins *
                             sizeof(struct mvebu_pinctrl_function), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!funcs)
@@ -510,26 +515,27 @@ static int mvebu_pinctrl_build_functions(struct 
platform_device *pdev,
        for (n = 0; n < pctl->num_groups; n++) {
                struct mvebu_pinctrl_group *grp = &pctl->groups[n];
                for (s = 0; s < grp->num_settings; s++) {
+                       int ret;
+
                        /* skip unsupported settings on this variant */
                        if (pctl->variant &&
                            !(pctl->variant & grp->settings[s].variant))
                                continue;
 
                        /* check for unique functions and count groups */
-                       if (_add_function(funcs, grp->settings[s].name))
+                       ret = _add_function(funcs, pctl->desc.npins,
+                                           grp->settings[s].name);
+                       if (ret == -EOVERFLOW)
+                               dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+                                       "More functions than pins(%d)\n",
+                                       pctl->desc.npins);
+                       if (ret)
                                continue;
 
                        num++;
                }
        }
 
-       /* with the number of unique functions and it's groups known,
-          reallocate functions and assign group names */
-       funcs = krealloc(funcs, num * sizeof(struct mvebu_pinctrl_function),
-                        GFP_KERNEL);
-       if (!funcs)
-               return -ENOMEM;
-
        pctl->num_functions = num;
        pctl->functions = funcs;
 


-- 
dwmw2

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to