On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 07:02:05PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 09:49 +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > I don't have a strong opinion on that, but I prefer not to have the list > > statically in the SoC specific drivers. I think counting the number of > > unique functions for each SoC specific driver once and verify the above > > heuristic (fewer unique functions than pins) is still valid. Then drop > > the krealloc and leave the array the way it is allocated on devm_kzalloc. > > Yeah. If you stick a check in the loop and make it warn if it *would* > have run over the end of the array, that sounds like it ought to be > fine. Something like this, perhaps? Still untested but otherwise > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <david.woodho...@intel.com> > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-mvebu.c > b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-mvebu.c > index c689c04..55d55d5 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-mvebu.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-mvebu.c > @@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static struct pinctrl_ops mvebu_pinctrl_ops = { > .dt_free_map = mvebu_pinctrl_dt_free_map, > }; > > -static int _add_function(struct mvebu_pinctrl_function *funcs, const char > *name) > +static int _add_function(struct mvebu_pinctrl_function *funcs, int nr_funcs, > + const char *name) > { > while (funcs->num_groups) { > /* function already there */ > @@ -487,7 +488,11 @@ static int _add_function(struct mvebu_pinctrl_function > *funcs, const char *name) > return -EEXIST; > } > funcs++; > + nr_funcs--; > } > + if (!nr_funcs)
shouldn't this be: if (nr_funcs <= 0) thx, Jason. > + return -EOVERFLOW; > + > funcs->name = name; > funcs->num_groups = 1; > return 0; > @@ -501,7 +506,7 @@ static int mvebu_pinctrl_build_functions(struct > platform_device *pdev, > int n, s; > > /* we allocate functions for number of pins and hope > - * there are less unique functions than pins available */ > + * there are fewer unique functions than pins available */ > funcs = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, pctl->desc.npins * > sizeof(struct mvebu_pinctrl_function), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!funcs) > @@ -510,26 +515,27 @@ static int mvebu_pinctrl_build_functions(struct > platform_device *pdev, > for (n = 0; n < pctl->num_groups; n++) { > struct mvebu_pinctrl_group *grp = &pctl->groups[n]; > for (s = 0; s < grp->num_settings; s++) { > + int ret; > + > /* skip unsupported settings on this variant */ > if (pctl->variant && > !(pctl->variant & grp->settings[s].variant)) > continue; > > /* check for unique functions and count groups */ > - if (_add_function(funcs, grp->settings[s].name)) > + ret = _add_function(funcs, pctl->desc.npins, > + grp->settings[s].name); > + if (ret == -EOVERFLOW) > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, > + "More functions than pins(%d)\n", > + pctl->desc.npins); > + if (ret) > continue; > > num++; > } > } > > - /* with the number of unique functions and it's groups known, > - reallocate functions and assign group names */ > - funcs = krealloc(funcs, num * sizeof(struct mvebu_pinctrl_function), > - GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!funcs) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > pctl->num_functions = num; > pctl->functions = funcs; > > > > -- > dwmw2 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/