On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:33:18 -0700 Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
> > patch #1: use SA_RESTORER, cc stable (please promise me this will work OK) > > I don't have the ability to build all the architectures, but it seems > like the best flag based on code review. SA_RESTORER looks OK back to 3.5 (at least). > > patch #2: switch to __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER, no cc stable > > > > I'm assuming this is all for 3.10, btw. If you think it should be in > > 3.9 then you need to write scarier changelogs. > > Well, I'm not sure it needs to be scarier; it's a serious local ASLR > info leak. I was hoping it could go into 3.9 since the expectation is > for it to go to stable, so why not put it in 3.9 now? OK. > Do you want me to spin up the 2-patch solution or is it too much of a hack? Is OK, I have it all lined up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
