David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> >  Even supposing that's so, a 36% rate of broken symbols is way too
> > high.  It argues that we need to do a thorough housecleaning at least
> > once in order to get back to an acceptably low stable rate.
> 
> Accepted. Can we let the 2.4 "angry penguin"-enforced stabilising period
> finish, and give the arch and subsystem maintainers a chance to finally
> brave the wrath of Linus and submit their patches, before we attempt do to
> it though?

I guess so.  We don't particularly have a choice, do we? :-)
-- 
                <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>

"Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a
troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left
to irresponsible action."
        -- George Washington, in a speech of January 7, 1790
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to