Re: [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention?

[David Woodhouse]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> If it can't be mechanically verified that the symbol has a correct
> reference  pattern within the tree, then it's broken.  That's a
> definition. 

Here's an alternative definition:

If the symbol has the letters 'F', 'I', 'S' and 'H' in it, in any order, 
then it's broken.

That's also a definition. It's not a particularly useful one, but neither 
was yours.

/me looks for a way to equate the original definition with the halting 
problem :)

--
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/