On 03/22, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
>
> +/**
> + * is_trap_insn - check if instruction is breakpoint instruction.
> + * @insn: instruction to be checked.
> + * Default implementation of is_trap_insn
> + * Returns true if @insn is a breakpoint instruction.
> + *
> + * This function is needed for the case where an architecture has multiple
> + * trap instructions (like powerpc).
> + */
> +bool __weak is_trap_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn)
> +{
> + return is_swbp_insn(insn);
> +}
OK, thanks, the whole series looks fine, just one note...
My patch also changed prepare_uprobe() to use is_trap_insn(), and I think
this is right. Exactly because of 3/3 which removes is_trap() from
arch_uprobe_analyze_insn().
If the original insn is_trap(), we do not want to singlestep it and get
another trap after we hit handle_swbp().
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
