On Fri, Mar 22 2013 at 4:50pm -0400,
Darrick J. Wong <darrick.w...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:21:56PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 13:11 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > The new writethrough strategy for dm-cache issues a bio to the origin
> > > device,
> > > remaps the bio to the cache device, and issues the bio to the cache
> > > device.
> > > However, the block layer modifies bi_sector and bi_size, so we need to
> > > preserve
> > > these or else nothing gets written to the cache (bi_size == 0). This
> > > fixes the
> > > problem where someone writes a block through the cache, but a subsequent
> > > reread
> > > (from the cache) returns old contents.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.w...@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > [...]
> >
> > This is not the correct way to submit a change to stable. See
> > Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
>
> Frankly, I'm not sure why agk sent the 3.9-fixes pull request to -stable. 7
> of
> the 10 commits are for dm-cache, and dm-cache is a new feature for 3.9. I
> probably could have dropped -stable from the cc: list when I started
> complaining about bugs. :)
Alasdair's pull mail was sent to stable because commit f046f89a99c ("dm
thin: fix discard corruption") cc'd stable and was included in the pull
request.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
