On 03/28/2013 04:41 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> More and more sub-architectures are using only the irqchip_init
> function. Make the core code call this function if no init_irq field is
> provided in the machine description to remove some boilerplate code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/irq.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
> index 8e4ef4c..df6f9a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <linux/ioport.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> #include <linux/random.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> @@ -114,7 +115,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_irq_flags);
>
> void __init init_IRQ(void)
> {
> - machine_desc->init_irq();
> + if (machine_desc->init_irq)
> + machine_desc->init_irq();
> + else
> + irqchip_init();
There needs to be an empty version defined for !OF.
Rob
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
