On 03/28/2013 09:51 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >> - the interface to bring up secondary cpus is different and based on >> PSCI, in fact Xen is going to add a PSCI node to the device tree so that >> Dom0 can use it. >> >> Oh wait, Dom0 is not going to use the PSCI interface even if the node is >> present on device tree because it's going to prefer the platform smp_ops >> instead. > > Waitaminute... I must have missed this part. > > Who said platform specific methods must be used in preference to PSCI?
I did. Specifically, I said the platform should be allowed to provide its own smp_ops. A platform may need to do addtional things on top of PSCI for example. > If DT does provide PSCI description, then PSCI should be used. Doing > otherwise is senseless. If PSCI is not to be used, then it should not > be present in DT. You can't assume the DT and kernel are in-sync. For example, I've added PSCI in the firmware and DTB (part of the firmware), but the highbank kernel may or may not use it depending if I convert it. Rob > > > Nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/