Hi, Mark,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brown [mailto:broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com]
> Sent: 2013年4月1日 21:46
> To: Yang, Wenyou
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; grant.lik...@secretlab.ca;
> richard.gen...@gmail.com; plagn...@jcrosoft.com; Ferre, Nicolas; Lin, JM;
> spi-devel-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/14] spi/spi-atmel: add flag to controller data for 
> lock
> operations
> 
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 03:46:03PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> 
> > +static void atmel_spi_lock(struct atmel_spi *as) {
> > +           spin_lock_irqsave(&as->lock, as->flags); }
> 
> Coding style.
I will change it in next version.

> 
> > -   spin_unlock(&as->lock);
> > +   atmel_spi_unlock(as);
> >     msg->complete(msg->context);
> > -   spin_lock(&as->lock);
> > +   atmel_spi_lock(as);
> 
> This replaces non-irqsave versions with irqsave versions of the lock.
> Is this safe/correct?  If it is I'd have expected some sort of mention of it 
> in the
> commit log.
I will add some commit log.

Best Regards,
Wenyou Yang

Reply via email to