(4/3/13 2:35 PM), Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> Currently we fail to include any data on hugepages into coredump,
> because VM_DONTDUMP is set on hugetlbfs's vma. This behavior was recently
> introduced by commit 314e51b98 "mm: kill vma flag VM_RESERVED and
> mm->reserved_vm counter". This looks to me a serious regression,
> so let's fix it.

I don't think this is enough explanations. Let's explain the code meaning
time to time order.

First, we had no madvice(DONTDUMP) nor coredump_filter(HUGETLB). then hugetlb
pages were never dumped.

Second, I added coredump_filter(HUGETLB). and then vm_dump_size became..

vm_dump_size()
{
        /* Hugetlb memory check */
        if (vma->vm_flags & VM_HUGETLB) {
                ..
                goto whole;
        }
        if (vma->vm_flags & VM_RESERVED)
                return 0;

The point is, hugetlb was checked before VM_RESERVED. i.e. hugetlb core dump 
ignored
VM_RESERVED. At this time, "if (vma->vm_flags & VM_HUGETLB)" statement don't 
need
return 0 because VM_RESERVED prevented to go into the subsequent flag checks.

Third, Jason added madvise(DONTDUMP). then vm_dump_size became...

vm_dump_size()
{
       if (vma->vm_flags & VM_NODUMP)
               return 0;

        /* Hugetlb memory check */
        if (vma->vm_flags & VM_HUGETLB) {
                ..
                goto whole;
        }
        if (vma->vm_flags & VM_RESERVED)
                return 0;

Look, VM_NODUMP and VM_RESERVED had similar and different meanings at this time.

Finally, Konstantin removed VM_RESERVED and hugetlb coredump behavior
has been changed.

Thus, patch [1/3] and [2/3] should be marked [stable for v3.6 or later].

Anyway, this patch is correct. Thank you!

Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to