On 2013/4/9 10:23, Tejun Heo wrote: > perf_event cgroup controller is one of the remaining few with broken > hierarchy support. It turns out it's pretty easy to implement - the > only thing necessary is making perf_cgroup_match() return %true also > when the cgroup of the current task is a descendant of the event's > cgroup. This patchset implements cgroup_is_descendant() and uses it > to implement hierarchy support in perf_event controller. > > This patchset contains the following three patches. > > 0001-cgroup-make-sure-parent-won-t-be-destroyed-before-it.patch > 0002-cgroup-implement-cgroup_is_descendant.patch > 0003-perf-make-perf_event-cgroup-hierarchical.patch > > The patches are also available in the following git branch, which is > based on top of cgroup/for-3.10. It's currently based on top of > cgroup/for-3.10 as the first patch causes non-trivial conflict with it > otherwise, which is not difficult to resolve but still nice to avoid > anyway. > > Li, Michal, I picked the first two patches from Li's memcg patchset. > Can we push the first two through cgroup/for-3.10 and put the rest in > -mm? >
Sure. Andrew asked me to resend the memcg patchset when we are at 3.10-rc1, because 3.9-rc6 is a bit too late and he's too busy. > Ingo, how should these be routed? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
