On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 04:48:03PM +0200, Bengt Jönsson wrote: > Reverting 500b4ac90d1103 makes sense, but first I want to mention > two things:
> 1. In some cases it is not even possible to know the actual current > state of a regulator because it is controlled by HW as well as SW. > We have several examples of this. If we're getting diverging statuses here then we need to introduce a separate function to report the actual hardware state. The get/set should be the request. > 2. regulator_enable/disable also checks the current status before > setting the regulator. Should these checks be removed as well? No, the enable state should reflect the state of the request from the AP. regulator_get_status() should return the actual physical state.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
