Hi,

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 05:37:48PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
> On Thursday 18 April 2013 09:28 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 05:04:24PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> >>@@ -1632,6 +1650,8 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops serial_omap_dev_pm_ops 
> >>= {
> >>    SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(serial_omap_suspend, serial_omap_resume)
> >>    SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(serial_omap_runtime_suspend,
> >>                            serial_omap_runtime_resume, NULL)
> >>+   .prepare        = serial_omap_prepare,
> >>+   .complete       = serial_omap_complete,
> >if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP isn't defined, this will break compilation.
> >
> True.
> 
> Then, will it not be  a better idea to add a similar macro[1] in
> include/linux/pm.h for
> prepare/complete callback as it is present for suspend/resume ?.
> 
> [1]:
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> #define SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn) \
>         .suspend = suspend_fn, \
>         .resume = resume_fn, \
>         .freeze = suspend_fn, \
>         .thaw = resume_fn, \
>         .poweroff = suspend_fn, \
>         .restore = resume_fn,
> #else
> #define SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn)
> #endif

might be :-)

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to