2013/04/19 8:28, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:33 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
  :

+static struct resource *get_resource(gfp_t flags)
+{
+       struct resource *res = NULL;
+
+       spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
+       if (bootmem_resource.sibling) {
+               res = bootmem_resource.sibling;
+               bootmem_resource.sibling = res->sibling;
+               memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
+       }
+       spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);


I prefer to keep memset() outside of the spin lock.

spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
if (..) {
        :
        spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
        memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
} else {
        spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
        res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);
}

Hmm. It is a little ugly. How about it?

spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
if (bootmem_resource.sibling) {
        res = bootmem_resource.sibling;
        bootmem_resource.sibling = res->sibling;
}
spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);

if (res)
        memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
else    
        res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);


Sounds good to me.

Great. I'll update it.

Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu


Thanks,
-Toshi




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to