[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Is this sufficient to do driver development? TUN/TAP doesn't let me > > write > > ethernet drivers inside UML. > For ISDN not really. For SCSI yes - scsi generic would let you write a > virtual scsi adapter 'owning' some physical devices Fine, so go ahead and write a UML SCSI adapter... I would love to see this happen. If you need UML help that's not on the site, let me know, and I'll be happy to do what I can. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? Paul J Albrecht
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? Jeff Dike
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? Ingo Oeser
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? Jeff Dike
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? Ingo Oeser
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or K... Jeff Dike
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB ... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, ... Jeff Dike
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, ... Bill Nottingham
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? Keith Owens
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? Amit S. Kale
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? Paul J Albrecht
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? Keith Owens
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? Amit S. Kale
- Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? Aaron Passey