* Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 07:49:43AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Please pull the latest sched-core-for-linus git tree from:
> > >
> > > The main changes in this development cycle were:
> > >
> > > - full dynticks preparatory work by Frederic Weisbecker
> >
> > Why does this have the crappy cputime scaling overflow code, when we
> > had a long thread about how to do it right *without* any 64-bit
> > divides, including a quality-tested patch?
> >
> > This still has the garbage "div64_u64_rem()" crap which actually SLOWS
> > DOWN 32-bit code even when not used (becuse it makes "div64_u64()"
> > calculate it even when unnecessary.
> >
> > WTF happened here? I and others spent efforts so that we wouldn't need
> > this kind of crap.
>
> I'm sorry, I was on vacations and has some other work to do, so I didn't
> send patches in timely manner. I just posted them today.
Linus, would you like me to revert d9a3c9823a2e and re-send the pull
request?
I intended to queue up Stanislaw's fixes in sched/urgent as the real
solution, but they arrived earlier today and are too fresh.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
