On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 10:23:31AM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 3 May 2013, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > static inline int cond_resched_rcu(void)
> > {
> > #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP) || !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU)
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > cond_resched();
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > This adds absolutely no overhead in non-debug builds of CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU,
> > does the checking in debug builds, and allows voluntary preemption in
> > !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU builds. CONFIG_PROVE_RCU builds will check for an
> > (illegal) outer rcu_read_lock() in CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU builds, and you
> > will get "scheduling while atomic" in response to an outer rcu_read_lock()
> > in !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU builds.
> >
> > It also seems to me a lot simpler.
> >
> > Does this work, or am I still missing something?
>
> Works perfectly. Thanks! Tested CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y/n,
> the errors messages with extra RCU lock.
Very good! Please send the patch along, and I will ack it.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
