On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Alex Shi <alex....@intel.com> wrote: > On 05/06/2013 04:01 PM, Paul Turner wrote: >> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Alex Shi <alex....@intel.com> wrote: >>> The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq. >>> but similar runnable variables work for UP in struct rq and task_group. >>> like rq->avg, task_group->load_avg. >>> So move them out, they also can work with UP. >> >> Is there a proposed use-case for UP? My apologies if I missed it in >> an alternate patch. > >> It would seem the only possibly useful thing there would the the >> per-rq average for p-state selection; but we can get that without the >> per-entity values already. > > > Do you mean to move the rq->avg and task_group->load_avg into CONFIG_SMP?
More generally: Why do we need them in !CONFIG_SMP? [ I was suggesting (potentially) using only rq->avg in the !CONFIG_SMP case. ] > > -- > Thanks > Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
