On 05/07/2013 11:06 AM, Paul Turner wrote: >> > Thanks Paul! >> > It seems work with this change if new __sched_fork move after the >> > p->sched_reset_on_fork setting. >> > >> > But why we initial avg sum to 1024? new task may goes to sleep, the >> > initial 1024 give a unreasonable initial value. >> > >> > guess let the task accumulate itself avg sum and period is more natural. > 1024 is a full single unit period representing ~1ms of time. > > The reason to store a small initial "observation" here is so that as > when we reach our next period edge our load converges (presumably > down) towards its true target more smoothly; as well as providing a > task additional protection from being considered "small" through > start-up. >
It will give new forked task 1 ms extra running time. That will bring incorrect info if the new forked goes to sleep a while. But this info should benefit to some benchmarks like aim7, pthread_cond_broadcast. So I am convinced. :) What's your opinion of this, Peter? -- Thanks Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/