On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:24:52AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > It will give new forked task 1 ms extra running time. That will bring > incorrect info if the new forked goes to sleep a while. > But this info should benefit to some benchmarks like aim7, > pthread_cond_broadcast. So I am convinced. :) > > What's your opinion of this, Peter?
We're going to get it wrong anyhow (lack of crystal ball instruction); overestimating the load seems like the best deal wrt latency for new tasks. The only other option we could try (not sure its even worth trying) would be half load. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/