On Tue, 7 May 2013, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 13:15 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Tue, 7 May 2013, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 15:51 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > Introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT on ARM. > > > > > > What about PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING? I'm not sure what it is but it > > > looks like a more lightweight version of pv stolen time? > > > > PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING selects PARAVIRT on x86 :-) > > Ah, that's maybe what confused me. > > TBH its not at all clear to me what distinction the core code is trying > to make with those two options, but do we not also want/need > PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING? Having reread the help text it seems to be > some sort of "more accurate" accounting?
It is not clear to me either. I think that you are right, we probably want PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING too. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
