On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 03:33:23PM -0400, Jean-François Dagenais 
(jeff.dagen...@gmail.com) wrote:
> To be honest, I didn't really thought about it that much, I just copy pasted 
> that from Evgeniy Polyakov's hunk at drivers/w1/w1_io.c, function 
> w1_reset_select_slave(struct w1_slave *sl) exept I changed the MATCH_ROM with 
> magic 0x96 and appended magic 0x3C. I have tested it only on the available 
> platform I have which is x86. I agree it looks dodgy. Do you have an 
> alternative? You are certainly more familiar with the kernel's fancy bit and 
> endian tools than I am. I'd be willing to test prior to sending V3.
> 
> 
> struct w1_reg_num
> {
> #if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
>       __u64   family:8,
>               id:48,
>               crc:8;
> #elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
>       __u64   crc:8,
>               id:48,
>               family:8;
> #else
> #error "Please fix <asm/byteorder.h>"
> #endif
> };
> 
> On the wire, the family byte should be sent first, then the MSB of id, then 
> the rest of id and finally the crc.
> 
> Perhaps Evgeniy can chime in here?

That's transform is only used to cast structure to uint64_t, nothing
fancy. In-memory structure should be ok because of above definition on
every endian.

-- 
        Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to