In commit 523c81135,it used "__refdata" on event_class_ftrace_##call.
It will cause kmemleak to misjudge because when loading module it did
not add '.ref.data' into kmemleak-scan-area.

Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/module.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index b049939..dafe2ea 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -2434,7 +2434,8 @@ static void kmemleak_load_module(const struct module *mod,
                const char *name = info->secstrings + info->sechdrs[i].sh_name;
                if (!(info->sechdrs[i].sh_flags & SHF_ALLOC))
                        continue;
-               if (!strstarts(name, ".data") && !strstarts(name, ".bss"))
+               if (!strstarts(name, ".data") && !strstarts(name, ".bss") &&
+                       !strstarts(name, ".ref.data"))
                        continue;
 
                kmemleak_scan_area((void *)info->sechdrs[i].sh_addr,
-- 
1.7.10.4

>From 9adf5b9aae7ceb97828042d0ae8fe9fb688bc691 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jianpeng Ma <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 10:04:14 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] module: Add section ".ref.data" into kmemleak-scan-area.

In commit 523c81135,it used "__refdata" on event_class_ftrace_##call.
It will cause kmemleak to misjudge because when loading module it did
not add '.ref.data' into kmemleak-scan-area.

Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/module.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index b049939..dafe2ea 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -2434,7 +2434,8 @@ static void kmemleak_load_module(const struct module *mod,
 		const char *name = info->secstrings + info->sechdrs[i].sh_name;
 		if (!(info->sechdrs[i].sh_flags & SHF_ALLOC))
 			continue;
-		if (!strstarts(name, ".data") && !strstarts(name, ".bss"))
+		if (!strstarts(name, ".data") && !strstarts(name, ".bss") && 
+			!strstarts(name, ".ref.data"))
 			continue;
 
 		kmemleak_scan_area((void *)info->sechdrs[i].sh_addr,
-- 
1.7.10.4

Reply via email to