On Wed, 15 May 2013 23:21:08 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 07:13:54PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> +static int process_sample_show(struct perf_tool *tool,
>> + union perf_event * event __maybe_unused,
>> + struct perf_sample *sample,
>> + struct perf_evsel *evsel __maybe_unused,
>> + struct machine *machine __maybe_unused)
>> +{
>> + struct perf_ftrace *ftrace;
>> + struct perf_ftrace_report *show;
>> + struct ftrace_report_arg *fra;
>> + struct stat statbuf;
>> + enum kbuffer_long_size long_size;
>> + enum kbuffer_endian endian;
>> + char buf[PATH_MAX];
>> +
>> + show = container_of(tool, struct perf_ftrace_report, tool);
>> + ftrace = show->ftrace;
>
> this seems to be exactly same routine as process_sample_report
> with exception of above 2 lines.. maybe the rest of it could be
> common function?
Hmm.. indeed. I'd rather use just one of them as only thing they do is
to get the ftrace pointer.
Thanks for pointing this out,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
