Am 20.05.2013 13:03, schrieb Jonathan Austin:
> Hi André
> 
> On 18/05/13 16:02, André Hentschel wrote:
>> Am 08.05.2013 21:03, schrieb André Hentschel:
>>> From: =?UTF-8?q?Andr=C3=A9=20Hentschel?= <n...@dawncrow.de>
>>>
> 
> This is strangely formatted for me too, and I use a different client from 
> Will so I'm not sure that the problem is just at our end...
> 
> (Also see that the list archive has weird formatting:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-May/167325.html )
> 
> Your first couple of patches didn't come out strangely formatted, so I'm not 
> really sure what's going on.

I'll retry it with plain Text or something. AFAIK git should understand this 
=UTF= style, though.

>>> Since commit 6a1c53124aa1 the user writeable TLS register was zeroed to
>>> prevent it from being used as a covert channel between two tasks.
>>>
>>> There are more and more applications coming to WinRT, Wine could support 
>>> them,
>>> but mostly they expect to have the thread environment block (TEB) in 
>>> TPIDRURW.
>>>
>>> This patch preserves that register per thread instead of clearing it.
>>> Unlike the TPIDRURO, which is already switched, the TPIDRURW
>>> can be updated from userspace so needs careful treatment in the case that we
>>> modify TPIDRURW and call fork(). To avoid this we must always read
>>> TPIDRURW in copy_thread.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: André Hentschel <n...@dawncrow.de>
>>> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Austin <jonathan.aus...@arm.com>
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> I'm not yet very familiar with the development process here,
>> am i getting no feedback on v4 because of the mergewindow being closed?
>> Or is there another reason? Sry for being impatient.
>>
> 
> This is a feature, not a fix, so most likely it'll be included at the next 
> merge window. For that to happen it should be in Russell's tree around the 
> middle of this cycle.
> 
> Can you please rebase on 3.10-rc2 (when it happens) and post one more 
> version? After that, assuming nobody else has any final comments, you could 
> put it in to Russell's patch system...
> 
> Just as a hint - one thing you might have done to increase the chances of 
> getting comments to clarify what's different between v3 and v4 - as a way to 
> make life easier for reviewers you can highlight the differences between 
> versions after the "---" (where you currently have the description of why 
> there are so many S-o-Bs).

I'll do, thank you very much for the reply and the clarification.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to