Grant,
On Wed, 29 May 2013, Grant Likely wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Rather than just straight reviewing the generic irq chip patch series, I
> tried it out by converting another driver to use it. As far as I've been
> able to tell it does the right thing and you can have my ack. The first
> patch in this series adds another feature needed by the versatile
> driver. Patch 2 should be okay, but I'd like to get an ack from Ben
> before it gets applied.
I pick up #1 and push it with the other lot, so people can start
working on top of that. I'll put it into a separate branch
(irq/for-arm) so SoC folks can grab it from there to avoid inter tree
dependencies.
> I need to get someone to test patch 3 on hardware before you pick up
> that one.
Sure. It might also go through the SoC tree(s).
> Oh, and I'll reply directly to patch 7 of your series with an ack and a
> minor comment.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
