From: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>

Our goal here is to eventually reduce the number of repetitive
acquire/release operations on mapping->tree_lock.

Logically, this patch has two steps:
1. rename __remove_mapping() to lock_remove_mapping() since
   "__" usually means "this us the unlocked version.
2. Recreate __remove_mapping() to _be_ the lock_remove_mapping()
   but without the locks.

I think this actually makes the code flow around the locking
_much_ more straighforward since the locking just becomes:

        spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
        ret = __remove_mapping(mapping, page);
        spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);

One non-obvious part of this patch: the

        freepage = mapping->a_ops->freepage;

used to happen under the mapping->tree_lock, but this patch
moves it to outside of the lock.  All of the other
a_ops->freepage users do it outside the lock, and we only
assign it when we create inodes, so that makes it safe.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de>

---

 linux.git-davehans/mm/vmscan.c |   43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~make-remove-mapping-without-locks mm/vmscan.c
--- linux.git/mm/vmscan.c~make-remove-mapping-without-locks     2013-05-30 
16:07:51.210104924 -0700
+++ linux.git-davehans/mm/vmscan.c      2013-05-30 16:07:51.214105100 -0700
@@ -450,12 +450,12 @@ static pageout_t pageout(struct page *pa
  * Same as remove_mapping, but if the page is removed from the mapping, it
  * gets returned with a refcount of 0.
  */
-static int __remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
+static int __remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
+                           struct page *page)
 {
        BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
        BUG_ON(mapping != page_mapping(page));
 
-       spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
        /*
         * The non racy check for a busy page.
         *
@@ -482,35 +482,44 @@ static int __remove_mapping(struct addre
         * and thus under tree_lock, then this ordering is not required.
         */
        if (!page_freeze_refs(page, 2))
-               goto cannot_free;
+               return 0;
        /* note: atomic_cmpxchg in page_freeze_refs provides the smp_rmb */
        if (unlikely(PageDirty(page))) {
                page_unfreeze_refs(page, 2);
-               goto cannot_free;
+               return 0;
        }
 
        if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
                __delete_from_swap_cache(page);
-               spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+       } else {
+               __delete_from_page_cache(page);
+       }
+       return 1;
+}
+
+static int lock_remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct page 
*page)
+{
+       int ret;
+       BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
+
+       spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+       ret = __remove_mapping(mapping, page);
+       spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+
+       /* unable to free */
+       if (!ret)
+               return 0;
+
+       if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
                swapcache_free_page_entry(page);
        } else {
                void (*freepage)(struct page *);
-
                freepage = mapping->a_ops->freepage;
-
-               __delete_from_page_cache(page);
-               spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
                mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(page);
-
                if (freepage != NULL)
                        freepage(page);
        }
-
-       return 1;
-
-cannot_free:
-       spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
-       return 0;
+       return ret;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -521,7 +530,7 @@ cannot_free:
  */
 int remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
 {
-       if (__remove_mapping(mapping, page)) {
+       if (lock_remove_mapping(mapping, page)) {
                /*
                 * Unfreezing the refcount with 1 rather than 2 effectively
                 * drops the pagecache ref for us without requiring another
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to