2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
commit b3449922502f5a161ee2b5022a33aec8472fbf18 upstream
Preparation. Add the new trivial helper, umh_complete(). Currently it
simply does complete(sub_info->complete).
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
[dannf: Adjusted to apply to Debian's 2.6.32]
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>
---
kernel/kmod.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c
index a061472..2a27d17 100644
--- a/kernel/kmod.c
+++ b/kernel/kmod.c
@@ -206,6 +206,11 @@ void call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(struct subprocess_info
*info)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(call_usermodehelper_freeinfo);
+static void umh_complete(struct subprocess_info *sub_info)
+{
+ complete(sub_info->complete);
+}
+
/* Keventd can't block, but this (a child) can. */
static int wait_for_helper(void *data)
{
@@ -245,7 +250,7 @@ static int wait_for_helper(void *data)
if (sub_info->wait == UMH_NO_WAIT)
call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(sub_info);
else
- complete(sub_info->complete);
+ umh_complete(sub_info);
return 0;
}
@@ -280,7 +285,7 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(struct work_struct *work)
/* FALLTHROUGH */
case UMH_WAIT_EXEC:
- complete(sub_info->complete);
+ umh_complete(sub_info);
}
}
--
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
