Haven't done a real review, but my eye fell on it:
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Chen Gang <[email protected]> wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/m32r/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/m32r/include/asm/atomic.h
> index 0d81697..233c743 100644
> --- a/arch/m32r/include/asm/atomic.h
> +++ b/arch/m32r/include/asm/atomic.h
> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static __inline__ int __atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v,
> int a, int u)
> }
>
>
> -static __inline__ void atomic_clear_mask(unsigned long mask, atomic_t *addr)
> +static __inline__ void atomic_clear_mask(unsigned int mask, atomic_t *addr)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned long tmp;
Shouldn't this become "unsigned int tmp" for consistency, too?
> @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static __inline__ void atomic_clear_mask(unsigned long
> mask, atomic_t *addr)
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> -static __inline__ void atomic_set_mask(unsigned long mask, atomic_t *addr)
> +static __inline__ void atomic_set_mask(unsigned int mask, atomic_t *addr)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned long tmp;
Likewise.
There may be other places that need changes.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
