On 06/10/2013 07:00 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Heiko Stübner <he...@sntech.de> wrote: > > (...) >> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> >> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h> >> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h> > > Hm I don't know if we're supposed to do things like this actually. > > It depends on whether the <dt-bindings/*> hierarchy is supposed > to stay in the kernel after the device trees are moved out to a > separate repo. > > Grant/Rob, shall we do this in drivers?
The entire reason I created the <dt-bindings/> directory (rather than just putting *.h into e.g. arch/arm/boot/dts) was to provide a place to share binding-defined constants between the DT files and drivers that implement that binding. It's certainly my opinion that if/when *.dts move out of the kernel, the <dt-bindings/> directory should continue to be present in the kernel, and take updates mirrored from the upstream binding repo. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/