On 06/10/2013 01:23 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/10/2013 07:00 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Heiko Stübner <he...@sntech.de> wrote: >> >> (...) >>> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> >>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h> >>> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h> >> >> Hm I don't know if we're supposed to do things like this actually. >> >> It depends on whether the <dt-bindings/*> hierarchy is supposed >> to stay in the kernel after the device trees are moved out to a >> separate repo. >> >> Grant/Rob, shall we do this in drivers? > > The entire reason I created the <dt-bindings/> directory (rather than > just putting *.h into e.g. arch/arm/boot/dts) was to provide a place to > share binding-defined constants between the DT files and drivers that > implement that binding. It's certainly my opinion that if/when *.dts > move out of the kernel, the <dt-bindings/> directory should continue to > be present in the kernel, and take updates mirrored from the upstream > binding repo.
Yes, agreed. Only kernel headers in a dts would be a problem. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/