On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org> wrote: > > Can you please refer to specific function names? I can't read your mind. > > You might be referring to quirk_disable_aspm_l0s(). This is a > pci_fixup_final quirk that calls pci_disable_link_state(). In the > current tree, we enumerate devices before requesting _OSC control. > However, pci_fixup_final quirks are not run until the > pci_apply_final_quirks() fs_initcall, which is after we request _OSC > control. > > As far as I can tell, we never call pci_disable_link_state() before > calling pcie_no_aspm().
ok, you are right, that is not pci_disable_link_state. It is pcie_aspm_init_link_state ==> pcie_aspm_sanity_check in booting path that disable aspm. It has "if (aspm_disabled)" in it, and it cause the difference. Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
