On 06/16/2013 02:39 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> static pte_t kvmppc_lookup_pte(pgd_t *pgdir, unsigned long hva, bool
>> writing,
>> - unsigned long *pte_sizep)
>> + unsigned long *pte_sizep, bool do_get_page)
>> {
>> pte_t *ptep;
>> unsigned int shift = 0;
>> @@ -135,6 +136,14 @@ static pte_t kvmppc_lookup_pte(pgd_t *pgdir, unsigned
>> long hva, bool writing,
>> if (!pte_present(*ptep))
>> return __pte(0);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Put huge pages handling to the virtual mode.
>> + * The only exception is for TCE list pages which we
>> + * do need to call get_page() for.
>> + */
>> + if ((*pte_sizep > PAGE_SIZE) && do_get_page)
>> + return __pte(0);
>> +
>> /* wait until _PAGE_BUSY is clear then set it atomically */
>> __asm__ __volatile__ (
>> "1: ldarx %0,0,%3\n"
>> @@ -148,6 +157,18 @@ static pte_t kvmppc_lookup_pte(pgd_t *pgdir, unsigned
>> long hva, bool writing,
>> : "cc");
>>
>> ret = pte;
>> + if (do_get_page && pte_present(pte) && (!writing || pte_write(pte))) {
>> + struct page *pg = NULL;
>> + pg = realmode_pfn_to_page(pte_pfn(pte));
>> + if (realmode_get_page(pg)) {
>> + ret = __pte(0);
>> + } else {
>> + pte = pte_mkyoung(pte);
>> + if (writing)
>> + pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + *ptep = pte; /* clears _PAGE_BUSY */
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>
> So now you are adding the clearing of _PAGE_BUSY that was missing for
> your first patch, except that this is not enough since that means that
> in the "emulated" case (ie, !do_get_page) you will in essence return
> and then use a PTE that is not locked without any synchronization to
> ensure that the underlying page doesn't go away... then you'll
> dereference that page.
>
> So either make everything use speculative get_page, or make the emulated
> case use the MMU notifier to drop the operation in case of collision.
>
> The former looks easier.
>
> Also, any specific reason why you do:
>
> - Lock the PTE
> - get_page()
> - Unlock the PTE
>
> Instead of
>
> - Read the PTE
> - get_page_unless_zero
> - re-check PTE
>
> Like get_user_pages_fast() does ?
>
> The former will be two atomic ops, the latter only one (faster), but
> maybe you have a good reason why that can't work...
If we want to set "dirty" and "young" bits for pte then I do not know how
to avoid _PAGE_BUSY.
--
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
