On Sunday, June 23, 2013 03:16:30 AM Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 12:22 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sunday, June 23, 2013 03:03:31 AM Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 12:07 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Saturday, June 22, 2013 06:05:50 PM Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > If any script needs something stable it should > > > > > depend on information available through other > > > > > sources like trace or proc or sysfs. > > > > > > > > That is clearly impossible in this particular case, though. > > > > > > Why couldn't this printk be converted into an equivalent tracepoint? > > > > Well, why wouldn't you try to do that? > > Why should I?
Because you're arguing that it should be done. If you think that it's better to use tracepoints here, please implement those tracepoints and show everyone that they are really better than what we have. Till then, we'll use what's already there. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
