On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:07:44PM +0100, James Hogan wrote: > > IMO changing the ABI by reducing _NSIG to 127 or 126 isn't appropriate > > for stable. > > How does this look for a nasty/stable fix?
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c > index 113411b..9ea8f4f 100644 > --- a/kernel/signal.c > +++ b/kernel/signal.c > @@ -2366,8 +2366,14 @@ relock: > > /* > * Death signals, no core dump. > + * > + * Some architectures (MIPS) have 128 signals which doesn't play > + * nicely with the exit code since there are only 7 bits to > + * store the terminating signal number. Mask out higher bits to > + * avoid overflowing into the core dump bit and triggering > + * BUG_ON in do_group_exit. > */ > - do_group_exit(info->si_signo); > + do_group_exit(info->si_signo & 0x7f); > /* NOTREACHED */ > } > spin_unlock_irq(&sighand->siglock); Looks like something which I think we could live with. Clearly it also scores in the "nasty" category, so fits the bill ;) Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
