On Wed, 23 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> dev_t rdev; > > > Reasonable. > > Good. We all agree. > (But now you see what I meant in comments about mknod.) > > >> kdev_t dev; > > > Useless. If you hope that block_device will help to solve rmmod races > > Yes. Why am I mistaken? Because the problems begin in subsystems. Solving the situation with block_device_operations is trivial. It's stuff on the character side that is going to bite you big way. TTY drivers, for example. They are below the layer where your kdev_t lives. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Helge Hafting
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Wayne . Brown
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer