On Wed, 23 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > But I don't want an initrd. > > Don't be afraid of words. You wouldnt notice - it would do its > job and disappear just like piggyback today. Andries, initrd code is _sick_. Our boot sequence is not a wonder of elegance, but that crap is the worst part. I certainly can understand people not wanting to use that on aesthetical reasons alone. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Helge Hafting
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Wayne . Brown
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer