On 07/02/2013 05:51 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
[snip]
>
> Well, as I said, its timing dependent. We might miss the newly onlined CPU in
> the for_each_online_cpu() loop itself, based on when exactly the CPU was added
> to the cpu_online_mask. So you can't exactly pin-point the places where you'll
> miss the CPU and where you won't. Besides, is it _that_ important? It is after
> all unpredictable..
Sure, it's nothing important ;-)
I just think this comment:
+ * We use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to protect against CPUs going
+ * offline but not online. CPUs going online during the call will
+ * not be seen or sent an IPI
It told people that the cpu could online during the call, but won't get
IPI, while actually they have a chance to get it, folks haven't look
inside may missed some thing when use it.
But it's just self-opinion, so let's put down the discuss :)
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
>> The comment position seems like it declaim that during the call of this
>> func, online-cpu won't be seem and send IPI...
>>
>
> Doesn't matter, AFAICS. The key take-away from that whole comment is: nothing
> is
> done to prevent CPUs from coming online while the function is running, whereas
> the online CPUs are guaranteed to remain online throughout the function. In
> other
> words, its a weaker form of get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus(), providing a
> one-way synchronization (CPU offline).
>
> As long as that idea is conveyed properly, the purpose of that comment is
> served,
> IMHO.
>
> Regards,
> Srivatsa S. Bhat
>
>
>>>>> *
>>>>> * You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or
>>>>> * from a hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler.
>>>>> @@ -641,26 +649,26 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu,
>>>>> void *info),
>>>>> might_sleep_if(gfp_flags & __GFP_WAIT);
>>>>>
>>>>> if (likely(zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus, (gfp_flags|__GFP_NOWARN)))) {
>>>>> - preempt_disable();
>>>>> + get_online_cpus_atomic();
>>>>> for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
>>>>> if (cond_func(cpu, info))
>>>>> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpus);
>>>>> on_each_cpu_mask(cpus, func, info, wait);
>>>>> - preempt_enable();
>>>>> + put_online_cpus_atomic();
>>>>> free_cpumask_var(cpus);
>>>>> } else {
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * No free cpumask, bother. No matter, we'll
>>>>> * just have to IPI them one by one.
>>>>> */
>>>>> - preempt_disable();
>>>>> + get_online_cpus_atomic();
>>>>> for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
>>>>> if (cond_func(cpu, info)) {
>>>>> ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func,
>>>>> info, wait);
>>>>> WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret);
>>>>> }
>>>>> - preempt_enable();
>>>>> + put_online_cpus_atomic();
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond);
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
